Rifkind versus superior court

Author: nefo

August undefined, 2024

WebFeb 22, 1994 · Rifkind v. Superior Court 22 Cal.App.4th 1255 (1994) Cited 9 times California Court of Appeal February 22, 1994 EPSTEIN, Acting P.J.: The petitioner in this case, an attorney, was sued by another attorney for improperly withdrawing money held in a joint account pending resolution of a fee dispute between them. WebMar 1, 2024 · The court first discussed analogous cases, including Rifkind v. Superior Court (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1255, holding that it was improper to ask at deposition “ ‘legal contention questions,’ ” which questions were condemned as requiring the party “ ‘to make a “law-to-fact” application that is beyond the competence of most lay persons.’

rulings.law - Tentative Ruling 19STCV24988 - 10/10/2024

WebRifkind v. Superior Court, 123 Cal. App. 3d 1045 (Cal. Ct. App. 1981) California Court of Appeal Filed: September 30th, 1981 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 123 Cal. App. 3d 1045, 177 Cal. Rptr. 82 Docket Number: 62273 Author: Gordon L. Files 123 Cal.App.3d 1045 (1981) 177 Cal. Rptr. 82 ROBERT GORE RIFKIND, Petitioner, v. WebSep 29, 2024 · Tentative ruling on case DANIEL GIRCH VS LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, ET AL. from ca on September 29, 2024 ... 2024 Dept: 26 Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles Department 26 daniel girch, Plaintiff, v. ... ( In re Marriage of Davenport (2011) 194 Cal. App. 4th 1507, 1526.) Courts are presumed to know and … inkjet cartridge recycling office depot

Using deposition testimony to support your motion to compel

Webquestion implicates Rifkind, a privilege, work product, or privacy. (Stewart v. Colonial Western Agency, Inc. (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 1006, 1015; Rifkind v. Superior Court (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1255, 1259.) was seeking discovery of a 28-page report. The Rifkind court found that it is improper to ask a party to state its legal WebJan 29, 2015 · The court then drew a parallel to Rifkind v. Superior Court (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1255, a well-known opinion which condemned the use of “legal contention questions” at deposition (i.e. asking a deponent to state all facts or identify all documents which support an affirmative defense). WebLike the superior court division, district courts hold trials and empanel juries to determine the facts of specific cases. District courts handle serious, but lower level crimes, and civil cases between $10,000 - $25,000. The state is divided into district court districts where the court usually sits in the county seat of each county. inkjet cartridge refill service mcmurray pa

RIFKIND v. SUPERIOR COURT 123 Cal.App.3d 1045 - Casemine

Judge Temporarily Halts Water Rate Reduction CT News Junkie

Because of the limited nature of the issues before us, it is not necessary to set out a detailed account of the underlying litigation, or the litigation out of which it, in turn, arose. Instead, we provide the following synopsis, related to the contention questions issue, reserving a fuller exposition of facts especially pertinent to … See more We emphasize at the outset what we are not discussing: questions at a deposition asking the person deposed about the basis for, or information about, a factual … See more Let an order issue, mandating the respondent court to vacate and set aside its order of June 8, 1993, directing petitioner to answer further questions at deposition … See more Weblate such answers. (Rifkind v. Superior Court (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1255, 27 Cal.Rptr.2d 822.) In that case, the court found that such questions were “unfair” at a deposition, 9 which, while true, is hardly a solid ground for a court, acting without any statutory authority, to categorically reject an earlier form of question. Rifkind’s inkjet cartridge refill torontoWebMar 12, 2024 · Superior Court, 54 Cal.2d 318 (1960); Rifkind v. Superior Court, 22 Cal.App.4th 1255 (1960). Tellingly, the Legislature could have used the exact same language with respect to document demands under section 2031.010, et seq. But, in drafting section 2031, the Legislature chose not to include any reference to the use of “contention” style ... mobility city holdings

"WebSep 23, 2024 · N.C. Court of Appeals Seat 5: Lora Christine Cubbage (Democrat) vs. Fred Gore (Republican) Cubbage is currently the Superior Court Judge for Guiliford County. She’s also been an assistant district attorney, assistant attorney general, and as a district court judge. Cubbage helped establish the drug and mental health courts. " - Rifkind versus superior court

Rifkind versus superior court

rulings.law - Tentative Ruling 19STCV24988 - 10/10/2024

WebRifkind v. Superior Court, 22 Cal. App. 4th 1255 (1994): Argued successfully, and established precedent of widespread use that “contention” deposition questions are improper. WebRIFKIND v. SUPERIOR COURT OPINION FILES, P.J. This original proceeding was brought here to review an order of the superior court made in a marriage dissolution proceeding, requiring petitioner (Husband) to produce documents and records which he says are irrelevant and privileged or confidential.

Did you know?

WebRifkind v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 123 Cal.App.3d 1045, 177 Cal.Rptr. 82 (1981); see Wells v. Wells, 108 Misc.2d 501, 437 N.Y.S.2d 622 (1981); Borg v. Borg, 32 Ill.App.3d 1075, 337 N.E.2d 391 (1...... Kaye v. Kaye United States New York Supreme Court Appellate Division July 16, 1984 ... (Quick v. WebAnd the Rule of Rifkind Probably the single most important Cali fornia deposition case is the Second District's decision in Rifkind v. Superior Court (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1255 (27 Cal.Rptr.2d 822]. Rifkind is an absolute must-know case for any litigator who de fends depositions, that is, all of us. It is

WebCOURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PAUL A. FIORAVANTI, JR. VICE CHANCELLOR LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER 500N. KING STREET, UITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801-3734 April 14, 2024 Daniel A. Mason, Esquire Elizabeth Wang, Esquire Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP 500 Delaware Avenue, Suite … WebSep 28, 1994 · Rifkind finds the asserted constitutional right in the Supreme Court's recent expressions that due process forbids the states from imposing punitive damages without judicial review of the trier of fact's assessment of them. That position was adumbrated in …

WebMar 23, 2024 · Any version of that type of examination, asking a witness to explain the basis of his legal contentions, is conduct condemned in Rifkind v. Superior Court (1994)22Cal.App.4th 1255 (Rifkind). We find that many lawyers are unaware of this important case. Make your practice more effective and efficient with Casetext’s legal … WebSummary In Rifkind v. Superior Court, supra, 123 Cal.App.3d 1045, 1048, 177 Cal.Rptr. 82, the court held " [e]ver since Webb v. Standard Oil Co. [, supra,] 49 Cal.2d 509, it has been the law of California that the disclosure of the contents of an income tax return may not be coerced for the benefit of a private litigant."

WebThe Rifkind laundry list. This is a good place to interpose a Rifkind objection also. Rifkind v. Sup. Ct. (Good) (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1255, 1259, stands for the proposition that it is improper to ask your client for legal contentions and the evidence supporting legal theories such as causation, damages, apportionment of fault. That is what ...

WebAn objection that every plaintiff lawyer should use is based upon Rifkind v. Sup. Ct. (Good) (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1255. Rifkind is a case you need to read if you defend depositions. Basically, the Rifkind objection applies to questions asking a deponent to explain his or her contentions in the case. mobility city long islandWebMay 27, 2024 · One case California litigators must have in their arsenal is Rifkind v. Superior Court , 22 Cal. App. 4th 1257 (1994). Counsel defending depositions will often lodge Rifkind objections to justify an instruction that the deponent not answer a question. mobility city of fairfax countyWebSuperior Court, supra, 117 Cal.App.3d 798, nor Rifkind v. Superior Court, supra, 123 Cal.App.3d 1045, was the information sought more than marginally relevant. However, Rifkind and Dompeling both state important principles to apply in considering disclosure of financial information. Dompeling v. mobility city murray utahWebSuperior Court (Good) (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1255 [27 Cal.Rptr.2d 822]Rifkind v. Superior Court (Good) (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1255 , 27 Cal.Rptr.2d 822[No. B075946.Second LawLink Deals Law Center Law Posts Law Documents Questions & Answers California Cases mobility city of northern marylandWebSecond Dist., Div. Four. Feb 23, 1994.] ROBERT GORE RIFKIND, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; NED GOOD, Real Party in Interest. [Opinion certified for partial publication. fn. * ] (Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. BC048093, Edward M. Ross, Judge.) mobility city of greater cleveland ohWebSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-3748-21 GOLD TREE SPA, INC., GOLD GARDEN OF WALL TOWNSHIP INC., and OK SIM BAIK, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. PD NAIL CORP., CD NAIL CORP., HEE JUNG KIM and SOOK HEE KIM, Defendants-Appellants, and PD NAIL CORP., CD NAIL CORP., HEE JUNG KIM and SOOK … mobility city of montgomery county txWebRifkind finds the asserted constitutional right in the Supreme Court's recent expressions that due process forbids the states from imposing punitive damages without judicial review of the trier of fact's assessment of them. That position was adumbrated in Pacific Mut. ink jet cartridge recycling programs